From: "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 02/12] oeqa/buildperf: use weston image instead of sato
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:16:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d94ba0eebc39fa15b9324e74c7c7ef18bf09e1ce.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109083133.16503-2-alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 09:31 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/test_basic.py | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/test_basic.py
> b/meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/test_basic.py
> index 2104617ba3..0fe7d3c8dc 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/test_basic.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/test_basic.py
> @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ from oeqa.buildperf import BuildPerfTestCase
> from oeqa.utils.commands import get_bb_var, get_bb_vars
>
> class Test1P1(BuildPerfTestCase):
> - build_target = 'core-image-sato'
> + build_target = 'core-image-weston'
>
> def test1(self):
> - """Build core-image-sato"""
> + """Build core-image-weston"""
> self.rm_tmp()
> self.rm_sstate()
> self.rm_cache()
> @@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ class Test1P2(BuildPerfTestCase):
>
>
> class Test1P3(BuildPerfTestCase):
> - build_target = 'core-image-sato'
> + build_target = 'core-image-weston'
>
> def test13(self):
> - """Build core-image-sato with rm_work enabled"""
> + """Build core-image-weston with rm_work enabled"""
> postfile = os.path.join(self.tmp_dir, 'postfile.conf')
> with open(postfile, 'w') as fobj:
> fobj.write('INHERIT += "rm_work"\n')
> @@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ class Test1P3(BuildPerfTestCase):
>
>
> class Test2(BuildPerfTestCase):
> - build_target = 'core-image-sato'
> + build_target = 'core-image-weston'
>
> def test2(self):
> - """Run core-image-sato do_rootfs with sstate"""
> + """Run core-image-weston do_rootfs with sstate"""
> # Build once in order to populate sstate cache
> self.run_cmd(['bitbake', self.build_target])
>
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ class Test3(BuildPerfTestCase):
>
>
> class Test4(BuildPerfTestCase):
> - build_target = 'core-image-sato'
> + build_target = 'core-image-weston'
>
> def test4(self):
> """eSDK metrics"""
This change is a big deal since it means numbers are no longer
comparable and we have quite the history of these build numbers. Not
quite sure how I feel about that...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-09 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 8:31 [RFC PATCH 01/12] core-image-weston: add sdk/ptest images Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] oeqa/buildperf: use weston image instead of sato Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 17:16 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] oeqa/core/tests/test_data.py: " Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] oeqa/selftest: transition to weston images Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] core-image-multilib-example: base on weston, and not sato Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] default-distrovars.inc: add wayland/opengl to default distro features Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] conf-notes.txt: mention more important images than just sato Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] weston-init: correctly start under systemd Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-14 8:46 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] weston-init: fall back to fbdev under x32 Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] wayland-utils: introduce a recipe Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] poky/conf-notes.txt: mention more important images than just sato Alexander Kanavin
2020-11-09 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] poky.conf: remove wayland/opengl from distro features, as it is now oe-core default Alexander Kanavin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d94ba0eebc39fa15b9324e74c7c7ef18bf09e1ce.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox