Re: [PATCH 24/53] directfb: Fix build with musl

Burton, Ross
2016-01-09T09:59:00Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]

On 9 January 2016 at 03:27, Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:

> For patches which fix 'correctness' issues uncovered by musl maybe
> it's better to apply the patches unconditionally, so they get some
> test cover from non-musl builds?
>
> Especially true in this case - see below.
>

Agreed. Patches should only be applied on overrides if they negatively
impact other configurations, so a strict correctness patch should always be
applied whereas a patch that stubs out glibc-specific code would be applied
on specific configurations.

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 986 bytes --]