From: David Partain <david.partain@est.tech>
To: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@ericsson.com>,
"elin-upstream@mailman.lmera.ericsson.se"
<elin-upstream@mailman.lmera.ericsson.se>
Cc: "richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org"
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
"paul@pbarker.dev" <paul@pbarker.dev>,
"alex.kanavin@gmail.com" <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>,
"Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com" <Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [ELIN-upstream] [PATCH 0/7] Mark recipes whose point releases are fixes-only (2/3)
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:40:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc83efc3a1190f4f79ae4bb19156bd6b35e38497.camel@est.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804141135.3779287-1-daniel.turull@ericsson.com>
On Tue, 2026-08-04 at 16:11 +0200, daniel.turull@ericsson.com wrote:
> From: Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@ericsson.com>
>
> Second of three series opting recipes into UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX. The
> first covered recipes whose upstream publishes a written stable-branch policy
> and
> is in master-next. This one covers recipes with no such document, qualifying
> instead on branch structure and changelog evidence; the third will cover
> smaller
> components with weaker evidence.
These all look good to me.
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 14:11 [PATCH 0/7] Mark recipes whose point releases are fixes-only (2/3) daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] libxml2: inherit upstream-stable-release-point daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] python3: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] openssl: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] binutils: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] libgcrypt: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] sqlite3: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] lttng-tools: " daniel.turull
2026-08-04 14:40 ` David Partain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc83efc3a1190f4f79ae4bb19156bd6b35e38497.camel@est.tech \
--to=david.partain@est.tech \
--cc=Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.turull@ericsson.com \
--cc=elin-upstream@mailman.lmera.ericsson.se \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox