From: "Anatol Belski" <anbelski@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
Cc: "Jamaluddin,
Khairul Rohaizzat" <khairul.rohaizzat.jamaluddin@intel.com>,
Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] glibc: Fix CVE-2021-27645
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:56:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd23f3e8-0db6-3f8b-466a-e9c9207c6604@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315213606.GP4892@denix.org>
Hi,
On 3/15/2021 10:36 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS#Stable.2FLTS_Patch_Acceptance_Policies
>
> Stable/LTS Patch Acceptance Policies
>
> Potentially Acceptable:
> * Bug fix only version upgrades for upstreams with a good stable process
>
> Unacceptable:
> * General version upgrades
>
>
> So, unless there's a bugfix-only minor release of glibc, e.g. 2.31.1,
> upgrading to 2.32 or 2.33 in stable branches is highly unlikely, as both
> 2.32 and 2.33 have long lists of major changes:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-announce/2020/000029.html
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-announce/2021/000030.html
thanks for linking the LTS doc.
My suggestion was to pull the latest upstream from 2.31 actually, not
upgrading the glibc version. As per
http://git.yoctoproject.org/clean/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc?h=dunfell
we consume from the branch release/2.31/master. It already contains the
backported patch fixing this CVE.
There doesn't seem to be a release process in terms of versions, but it
regularly receives backports. In fact,
there are already some bug and CVE fixes between the current SRCREV used
and HEAD.
Regards
Anatol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 15:21 [PATCH] glibc: Fix CVE-2021-27645 Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat
2021-03-11 23:55 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2021-03-12 19:34 ` Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat
2021-03-12 23:15 ` Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat
2021-03-13 23:20 ` Anatol Belski
2021-03-15 21:36 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2021-03-16 12:56 ` Anatol Belski [this message]
2021-03-16 15:45 ` Steve Sakoman
2021-03-16 20:23 ` Anatol Belski
2021-03-18 18:31 ` Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat
2021-03-18 19:15 ` Khem Raj
2021-03-18 19:29 ` Steve Sakoman
2021-03-18 19:31 ` Khem Raj
2021-03-16 17:44 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2021-03-16 17:46 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd23f3e8-0db6-3f8b-466a-e9c9207c6604@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=anbelski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=denis@denix.org \
--cc=khairul.rohaizzat.jamaluddin@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox