Hello,

GCC regression test performed on Kirkstone with gcc-11.3 & gcc-11.2. The results are NOT identical. Below is test summary.

gcc-11.3:

                === gcc Summary ===

 

# of expected passes            126552

# of unexpected failures        24295

# of unexpected successes       77

# of expected failures          782

# of unresolved testcases       10

# of unsupported tests          2760

/home/bft1/skokkonda/kirkstone/poky/build/sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/x86_64-poky-linux/x86_64-poky-linux-gcc  version 11.3.0 (GCC)

gcc-11.2:

                === gcc Summary ===

 

# of expected passes            125933

# of unexpected failures        24215

# of unexpected successes       76

# of expected failures          773

# of unresolved testcases       10

# of unsupported tests          2779

/home/bft1/skokkonda/kirkstone-gcc-11.2/poky/build/sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/x86_64-poky-linux/x86_64-poky-linux-gcc  version 11.2.0 (GCC)

11.3: # of expected passes            126552
11.2: # of expected passes            125933

So >= 619 additional tests were added and they mostly pass (as you'd expect).
That's good news.

gcc-11.3 & gcc-11.2 test summaries are attached.

I didn't look at these yet but  thanks for providing them.

Since we're not seeing any runtime regression in our Yocto
test suite, I suspect that we shouldn't panic but should instead
just work to understand, fix, upstream and monitor for future regressions.

../Randy

--
Thanks,
Sundeep K.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#166997): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/166997
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/91503792/3616765
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

-- 
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux