From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17532605B3 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 19:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id w4NJmdRr006784 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.25.44.2] (172.25.44.2) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:48:39 -0700 To: References: <20180519162102.GL19965@denix.org> <20180519193341.GM19965@denix.org> <20180520005742.GN19965@denix.org> From: Randy MacLeod Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 15:48:38 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.25.44.2] Subject: Re: GCC 9 Drops Support For Older ARM Microarchitecture Versions X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 19:48:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/20/2018 10:59 AM, akuster808 wrote: > Maybe a bug is in order and then we might be able to add it to the 2.6 > planning? Not my bug to file... anyone? > > Maybe a QEMU strategy for OE going forward may also be a topic. There is meta-qemuarma9: https://github.com/OverC/meta-qemuarma9.git I'm not an arm man but would it make sense for oe-core to drop qemuarm and use qemuarma9? -- # Randy MacLeod # Wind River Linux