Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
To: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org, ross.burton@arm.com,
	"hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com" <hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com>
Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/9] multilib_header.bbclass: need multilib headers for nativesdk builds
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:21:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e75c42db-e992-4436-bb46-1bc0b4c295fb@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b029a8a84294c6cad08dae46a5cfec398bc04a6d.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2476 bytes --]

Sorry for replying late, I am just back from the vacation

On 2/6/25 15:39, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Wed, 2025-01-29 at 16:58 +0000, Ross Burton via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> On 21 Jan 2025, at 08:55, hongxu via lists.openembedded.org
>> <hongxu.jia=eng.windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org>  wrote:
>>> The nativesdk multilib support required it to fix multilib headers
>>> conflict
>> So the context here is that luajit apparently needs to be able to
>> build native code with the same word size as the target.  But this
>> demonstrates nicely that nobody has tried to build a 32-bit luajit on
>> a 64-bit non-x86 machine, for example:
>>
>>> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-m32’
>> So if the goal is “build luajit everywhere” then this doesn’t solve
>> that problem.
> I've been giving this a lot of. Part of me does like this solution but
> equally, it is complicating something which is already quite complex
> for a comparatively isolated problem. As Ross mentions, it only fixes
> this for a small subsection there too, it isn't a universal fix.
>
> Some of the patches in the series are simple/trivial but others have
> what looks like quite fragile logic (e.g. the libgcc paths).
>
> I'm not convinced merging this and trying to support multilib
> nativesdk-gcc is in our best interests unfortunately.

Agree with you, follow your suggestion, I will drop libgcc patches to 
supportmultilib nativesdk-gcc

and pick up the simple/trivial patches from the series and resend them 
in v2, including:

  [OE-core] [PATCH 3/9] toolchain-shar-relocate.sh: support multiple 
dynamic loaders for multilib
  [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] script/relocate_sdk.py: check dynamic loader 
arch before relocating interpreter

//Hongxu

> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#210907):https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210907
> Mute This Topic:https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110730419/3617049
> Group Owner:openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  [hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4418 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21  8:55 [PATCH 1/9] perl: fix do_install failed for nativesdk-perl Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] multilib_header.bbclass: need multilib headers for nativesdk builds Hongxu Jia
2025-01-27 13:18   ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-01-29 16:58   ` Ross Burton
2025-02-06  7:39     ` Richard Purdie
2025-02-07  5:21       ` Hongxu Jia [this message]
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 3/9] toolchain-shar-relocate.sh: support multiple dynamic loaders for multilib Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 4/9] script/relocate_sdk.py: check dynamic loader arch before relocating interpreter Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] libgcc-common: apply multilib symlinks for nativesdk libgcc Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] meta/conf/bitbake.conf: support multiarch for nativesdk Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] gcc-configure-common.inc: add multlib support for i686/i586/x86_64 nativesdk gcc Hongxu Jia
2025-01-22  4:20   ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2025-01-23  4:53   ` [PATCH v2 " Hongxu Jia
2025-01-23 15:49     ` [OE-core] " Yoann Congal
2025-01-23 17:17     ` hongxu
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] Add recipe nativesdk-multiconfig-multlib-toolchain-packager Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  9:05   ` Patchtest results for " patchtest
2025-01-21  9:12   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] nativesdk-multiconfig-multlib-toolchain-packager: add recipe Hongxu Jia
2025-01-21  8:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] selftest/multiconfig: test multiconfig multlib nativesdk gcc Hongxu Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e75c42db-e992-4436-bb46-1bc0b4c295fb@windriver.com \
    --to=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
    --cc=hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox