From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.673.1607120350317782551 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:19:10 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17q1 header.b=T8J1PaAl; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.19.142, mailfrom: dmurphy@ti.com) Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B4MJ6ZP006170; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:06 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1607120346; bh=FYbaGcAymvPujiqKLKJAbZAQf4kGPWUA2hUA7M4OT8Y=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=T8J1PaAl5EPX9ymsTeDny+PET2oxLElc7AXPoMCOX4UKIle5DMWw7wDC1YnJisPYG kynXK2EX7tY/NhTXoJa92uIjtKywNdFomkSDyf9AwAe3CH5AQ7FHm8K0gN42xGSNWX QzAYmbFnnoerL7LfDnkd2yMgWT/hZxVFsd5bYrRU= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0B4MJ6fj032439 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:06 -0600 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:05 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:05 -0600 Received: from [10.250.40.192] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B4MJ5nL024366; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:05 -0600 Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC]Backport of a patch from master to dunfell To: Steve Sakoman CC: Bruce Ashfield , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , Richard Purdie References: <8a9e9b68-8fc3-824e-a6aa-7556945cea59@ti.com> From: "Dan Murphy" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:19:05 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Steve Awesome thanks! The 3 patches will fix our issues Dan On 12/4/20 4:18 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > I sent a pull request yesterday for a series that includes this patch. > > Richard will probably merge it to dunfell in the next day or two. > > Steve > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:30 AM Dan Murphy via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: >> Hello >> >> How do we get this patch below backported to dunfell? >> >> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass?h=gatesgarth&id=d9e327063f63193186822d958706081d64ec8139 >> >> We at TI are seeing similar issues with Dunfell and cryptodev modules on >> 5.10 builds. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >>