From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CB674703 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPSA id w85Ej5bw002251 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa , Alexander Kanavin Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:45:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180905085322.GA1795@jama> References: <20180905085322.GA1795@jama> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.1 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] openssl: rename openssl 1.0.x to openssl10 and make openssl 1.1.x the default version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:45:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 10:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > But patching the components to use libssl10 might actually work > (unlike > just changing DEPENDS to openssl10). > > It's not only conflicting in build-time in RSS, but it will conflict > on target as well. You either need to migrate all components included > in image to 1.1 or all stay on 1.0. That isn't quite the case. For OE-Core we have images using both 1.0 (openssh) and 1.1 installed together. Its true there are some issues if you try and parallel install both the -dev packages but normal target images are working. We could probably "fix" the -dev images to an extent by making 1.1 replace 1.0 dev pieces. The build time sysroot problem is harder unfortunately, I've ideas about things we might be able to do but haven't experimented as yet. Cheers, Richard