From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx5-out4.antispamcloud.com (mx5-out4.antispamcloud.com [95.211.112.140]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35BA6E671 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [37.74.225.130] (helo=TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL) by mx16.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e07qN-0002BB-NQ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:13:59 +0200 Received: from [192.168.80.121] (192.168.80.121) by webmail.topic.nl (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:11:11 +0200 To: Mark Hatle , References: <8b6c437e-c5b6-d242-5e1c-b19406153c76@topic.nl> <67768df5-8082-3433-715c-1c2bfde6f973@windriver.com> From: Mike Looijmans Organization: TOPIC Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:11:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <67768df5-8082-3433-715c-1c2bfde6f973@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.121] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 X-Originating-IP: 37.74.225.130 X-SpamExperts-Domain: topic.nl X-SpamExperts-Username: 37.74.225.128/28 Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=37.74.225.128/28@topic.nl X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.06) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5sU53PUFfZeMMIjAbUdPaeLj1g3/PwYZaTCzSym8uE9HvoxsIfwmujs4 UOrXl248KTkxGO3xPuDGGj+T6m0BNnKM+/sFVMoIHnzxJpiwTwAmqWxCevbUegdCrqkn8BN/sWd4 eVQenz4xphqJKP0dRPWmP+iYoTRfG3SLW0gfQ6rLJODXbtOodkPED+RkHjVGH3TWJTnICwGTU7LM aFTMQsEQBXQehZAw53rSqbeSUIU4NKSQWVBnPrIWvYqYGP1aNtZz48gHvPQ0UmHwU3XQhzrjVz9K Ka2GB85CKktVlR/ruy9b95OwDfa+3+faRJUYC8WQLFnbnCX5K4adoQhG7XrWqQrvjbLjAJ6zwVNk BXXZKm6lMVkj+9pP4XWwiQxKYAoJ3D/jrz/orF2VK/tUWXle8O4UaQ65EbCqFI8jiLSYTs5Ex5aN ZlcgVQFtAhrEij3dKxLhoxcmaInYbR5vlqETd+klAX+KFYkIxu6zxdn+fOdU2kQFJEzfkq4ITozm M1IcMSgqtcKbU9La+AHiCFDnINtKVoUnVVMer0Qph9Fbpl8rF453rlG/1n4zSXbJjyhOIYE4lDmb 2NVqBXfxmgK7STU9vrYIzoMR2j5djfzYu3xR9bCO/oqR3AHGXQVqcFUGXEqeSRtBFSfro95dU96O 1h2k8MMMGK5xfZe1ll0lhoJiRUJS+7Nru8G8qObMBG1dlkmnH++bD8PSb0NC6llpkO38sG1M3PLd 4FMUvKCUSrV7e21EZ5ENNEwrw2xtjSG7X+t1TW39Ja77LGPpOwCuJ90jeAKp5iAznIBNlUTTowGb m573sCRtOXWWr/2JorwjPe6j4XgiZDvpuIpgLNadFgv0S75cf9sL6UMT5Be1UGlP9nCUO1/T3hbt M3dprmUVrBsPGnNiJ83AD/4JscDdpjPAXF36ccukK2jUdhJTCyDUcpJ0w2xStbwnOgfhtrH8Xdig nLzwiE7qHomxhHk= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine2.antispamcloud.com Subject: Re: Recipe versions and layer confusion X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:14:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: nl Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFOn 05-10-17 16:59, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 10/5/17 9:49 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> I'm confused. >> >> Layer "meta-xilinx" defines: >> >> recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb >> >> This recipe is too old for my liking, so I made a newer one in "meta-top= ic" >> >> recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.3.bb >> >> >> Much to my surprise, when I build, OE picks the 2017.1 version and not t= he >> 2017.3 version. >=20 > Typically the version is selected by whichever PV is 'higher'. However t= here > are many ways to change this behavior. >=20 > The primary way is for a configuration file (often the machine configurat= ion) to > defined a preferred version. I.e. >=20 > PREFERRED_VERSION_arm-trusted-firmware =3D "2017.1" >=20 > Most likely there is a line like that someone in meta-xilinx. Nope, no such line. >=20 > Additional ways would be to have a recipe define itself as never the defa= ult > version. >=20 >> bitbake-layers show-layers reveils: >> .. >> meta-xilinx /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-xilinx 5 >> meta-topic /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-topic 6 >> .. >=20 > The layer priority does not directly affect recipe selection. It may if = you > have two layers of the -same- version. >=20 > --Mark >=20 >> so that means that my meta-topic should win even if my PV were lower, ri= ght? >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Mike Looijmans >> System Expert >> >> TOPIC Products >> Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best >> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best >> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 >> E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com >> Website: www.topicproducts.com >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail >> >> >> Visit us at the Space Tech Expo Europe (Stand E-71) >> >=20 Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Products Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Visit us at the Space Tech Expo Europe (Stand E-71)