From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
To: Grygorii Tertychnyi <gtertych@cisco.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: ✗ patchtest: failure for curl: fix for CVE-2018-16839/CVE-2018-16840/CVE-2018-16842
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:09:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9ef8495-0501-9aec-e667-bc005c259d2a@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7mn2zlc.fsf@cisco.com>
On 11/6/18 1:39 AM, Grygorii Tertychnyi wrote:
>
> On Fri Nov02 2018 @ 06:48, Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have add CVE tag in the patch file, is this test result incorrect?
>
> My guess is it was fooled by (well, "incorrect") "CVE-YYYY-XXXX"
> lines. Even thouhg it is followed by the (correct) "CVE:
> CVE-YYYY-XXXX" in your CVE patches
>
> 43 # first match is lax but second strict
> 44 if self.re_cve_payload_pattern.match(line):
> 45 if not self.re_cve_payload_tag.match(line):
> 46 self.fail('Missing or incorrectly
> formatted CVE tag in included patch file',
> 47 'Correct or include the CVE
> tag on cve patch with format: "CVE: CVE-YYYY-XXXX"', 48 commit)
> Do you really need "incorrect" lines?
Thanks. the incorrect line are not necessary. I will rework this patch
based on new updated version 7.61.1
//changqing
>
>> On 11/2/18 2:41 PM, Patchwork wrote:
>>> == Series Details ==
>>>
>>> Series: curl: fix for CVE-2018-16839/CVE-2018-16840/CVE-2018-16842
>>> Revision: 1
>>> URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/14764/
>>> State : failure
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core.
>>> This is
>>> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
>>> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * Patch curl: fix for
>>> CVE-2018-16839/CVE-2018-16840/CVE-2018-16842
>>> Issue Missing or incorrectly formatted CVE tag in
>>> included patch file [test_cve_tag_format]
>>> Suggested fix Correct or include the CVE tag on cve patch
>>> with format: "CVE: CVE-YYYY-XXXX"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply
>>> to the
>>> mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your
>>> concerns.
>>> Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and
>>> submitting a new
>>> version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you
>>> add/increment the
>>> version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH
>>> v2] ->
>>> [PATCH v3] -> ...).
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Guidelines:
>>> https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
>>> Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
>>> Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> BRs
>>
>> Sandy(Li Changqing)
>
>
--
BRs
Sandy(Li Changqing)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-02 6:07 [PATCH] curl: fix for CVE-2018-16839/CVE-2018-16840/CVE-2018-16842 changqing.li
2018-11-02 6:41 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for " Patchwork
2018-11-02 6:48 ` Changqing Li
2018-11-05 17:39 ` Grygorii Tertychnyi
2018-11-06 2:09 ` Changqing Li [this message]
2018-11-02 16:05 ` [PATCH] " akuster808
2018-11-05 2:32 ` Changqing Li
2018-11-09 16:36 ` akuster808
2018-11-12 1:46 ` Changqing Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9ef8495-0501-9aec-e667-bc005c259d2a@windriver.com \
--to=changqing.li@windriver.com \
--cc=gtertych@cisco.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox