Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe-commits] [openembedded-core] branch thud updated (ad0a553 -> 748f946)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:50:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed62bdd5-c9ad-1796-2330-960d6072317d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbNGRQBHySVaqLXNNTbM5xvo5fOh-UxzogyjC6Rm1_6_WETcw@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/16/19 5:20 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/15/19 10:24 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> Replied to wrong mailing
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:38 PM <git@git.openembedded.org> wrote:
>>>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>>>>
>>>> rpurdie pushed a change to branch thud
>>>> in repository openembedded-core.
>>>>
>>>>     from ad0a553  build-appliance-image: Update to thud head revision
>>>>      add 0bbe3d5  kernel: use olddefconfig as the primary target for KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND
>>>>      add 933712e  linux-yocto/4.18: update to v4.18.22
>>>>      add 193eb75  icecc: readlink -f on the recipe-sysroot gcc/g++
>>>>      add 57673fe  icecc: Trivial simplification
>>>>      add d4ec470  icecc: Syntax error meant that we weren't waiting for tarball generation
>>>>      add 46db052  icecc: Don't generate recipe-sysroot symlinks at recipe-parsing time
>>>>      add 9d3587d  icecc: patchelf is needed by icecc-create-env
>>>>      add d8bf7e5  eudev: upgrade 3.2.5 -> 3.2.7
>>>>      add a316146  gsettings-desktop-schemas: upgrade 3.28.0 -> 3.28.1
>>>>      add 88581ac  libatomic-ops: upgrade 7.6.6 -> 7.6.8
>>>>      add 7c6e9f5  libpng: upgrade 1.6.35 -> 1.6.36
>>>>      add be1429b  common-licenses: update Libpng license text
>>>>      add 93c76fe  i2c-tools: upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1
>>>>      add b09f261  oeqa/utils/qemurunner: Print output when failed to login
>>>>      add 47731b4  grub2: Fix passing null to printf formats
>>>>      add e3ef28a  gnupg: Upgrade to 2.2.12 release
>>>>      add a44c7ba  tzdata/tzcode-native: update to 2018i
>>>>      add 4a7945c  lighttpd: update to 1.4.51
>>>>      add 4f14eac  boost: update to 1.69.0
>>> In my infinite naivety I just updated thud.
>>>
>>> * Many updates here - wasn't there some policy just to update in case
>>> of 'emergency'?
>> Nope the process does not say that. I will update recipes when they
>> bugfix updates.  I have been doing that for years. In fact, you should
>> be seeing something on the arch list to make the process standard.
>>> * How can you update boost on a stable branch - a first class citizen
>>> for build trouble?
>> Don't recall the thought process on a given backport especial when its 3
>> months back. Can't tell why I decided to update boost.
>>
>> - armin
>>
>>> Wonder which further fallout I'll get...
>>>
>>> Andreas
> Just for the record:
>
> 1. In [1] I read at policies:
>
> * No recipe upgrades unless:
>   * The old version is completely broken
>   * The new version contains a security patch or other critical bugfix
> that is too difficult to backport to the version already in the stable
> branch
For completeness:

As always, the stable branch maintainers' judgement is important when it
comes to deciding which fixes are or are not appropriate. If there is
doubt, feel free to consult with the overall project maintainer (Richard
Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>).


> 2. This was applied on Feb 6th which is not 3 month back exactly.
then its worst than I thought, I can't remember what my thought process
was back to Feb 6th.
>
> [1] https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance#Point_release

I am glad you are bringing these things up, it helps me revisit my own
processes and help me improve.

We are planning on revising the maintenance guidelines soon so I hope to
get your input.


- armin
>
> Andreas




  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-16 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <154947113576.452.14618413373824638023@git.openembedded.org>
     [not found] ` <CALbNGRRLfW_ih43gr8n_rG5YcLQizAs4Mhi0rU_TVjoCCyw1Ag@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-15 17:24   ` [oe-commits] [openembedded-core] branch thud updated (ad0a553 -> 748f946) Andreas Müller
2019-03-16 11:11     ` akuster808
2019-03-16 12:20       ` Andreas Müller
2019-03-16 15:50         ` akuster808 [this message]
2019-03-17 13:08           ` Adrian Bunk
2019-03-17 15:38             ` akuster808
2019-03-17 16:25               ` Adrian Bunk
2019-03-17 16:40                 ` akuster808

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed62bdd5-c9ad-1796-2330-960d6072317d@gmail.com \
    --to=akuster808@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=schnitzeltony@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox