From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350996B6F7 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2017 07:29:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,459,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="26090571" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.219.5.165]) ([10.219.5.165]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2017 07:29:53 -0800 To: Markus Lehtonen , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1482930164-15721-1-git-send-email-markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> <1482930164-15721-4-git-send-email-markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> From: Mariano Lopez Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:30:31 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1482930164-15721-4-git-send-email-markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] oeqa.utils.metadata: drop 'unknown' git data elements X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:29:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 28/12/16 07:02, Markus Lehtonen wrote: > It's better just to not have the xml elements than to have elements with > faux data. One could have git branch named 'unknown', for example. > > I don't think is a good idea to completely remove the layer from the metadata when such layer is not a repository, it would remove valuable information for later analysis. And if you ask would do such a thing, I would, I have my own debug layers that can mess with testing.