From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C476071F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2016 04:25:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,383,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1102458614" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2016 04:25:44 -0800 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1482308378-15213-1-git-send-email-mingli.yu@windriver.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:25:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpgme: add GPGME_STATUS_KEY_CONSIDERED X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:25:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/21/2016 01:14 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgme.git;a=commitdiff;h=315fb73d4a774e2c699ac1804f5377559b4d0027 > > > > Can you explain *why* we should cherry pick a patch from upstream? Because someone didn't check RRS, which would suggest an update to gpgme 1.8.0 should be done instead. http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/834/ Alex