From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B356660069 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:29:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2018 09:29:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,311,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="35298910" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2018 09:29:26 -0700 To: Martin Jansa References: <20180312164944.39923-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <20180312164944.39923-4-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:22:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lib/oe/patch.py: add a warning if patch context was ignored X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:29:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/15/2018 05:13 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Now when more people will use devtool to refresh patches, would it make > sense for devtool to use --no-signature when refreshing patches? I don't think that will help much to reduce the amount of change in the refresh. The refesh will also update the line numbers in chunks so that they match reality, and convert patches into git format - all useful things. Alex