From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.485.1624914641657422001 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:10:41 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qt+zzREH; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.210.172, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 21so15305140pfp.3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jxIkfiJI3/BiyRM9BBCClbnKahAEkTv1sXXqCHCJnZI=; b=qt+zzREH6VY0VI3iqqdoTuvCzhMSq6+Xvh6BY+u+9Pkcyhr6+LItCteIRXxxgs/oqZ k4nAJDFymVqRd+/EhjeMw7hxtixGpXSTQDsd82Oc23MpG8Py7er5T3M0yl+qs4Ups46K vl84OaIScScOYdGypwCtbUqCQG901fWu1bQ9JjQv45kgeFXNq4xbbDYdqatqt++/c8xw ugfs1hr4a6U0Oz/R25aBNWFwaQ1c8kpcAMxhQb/IGbm8etB63xCy9EUayyeH6H+fOTWp YCSm6AcYxPukeYiSapxGQLpb0+6WhCKe+PYxvE3LUV/qsh01q0LuzPSeCOtW+9CIH0BC DLsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jxIkfiJI3/BiyRM9BBCClbnKahAEkTv1sXXqCHCJnZI=; b=VIw0Nl9wTSWRXtBlG7Jo/FLM3wgVdxzTNpVu+wC7vdn+CSeUPsbXywPXDk1ZIf/tXo d1VitL+Hi6LgB3BX5/2t6/CLUm2LktmEpuopMq0lln7rkYZIyROoFX6L9R9pGaoEciob 7z4H2PW8BdbdalGU8G4ZsFIxDHbBa3QwPUYutOvU5YQVGOPFhHAsVfdooR1/jhQt0+sU nPIVkjgeGGYLV9ZSlkBR3lUKYofDHVEpWPsf47ZrlvLh5HFm04/mMYPcxazD/3ZFtYsv 9NZlXauAI0e+od27M/l7wCvIlF2qKy6ECiKN1ltrIXVfskuDg+yjNVIsFrvANq3p+zjz 9Xdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Tl70WCR2Np+SV3nfM0efUIYVbtr+t9GJpFZ7Mpzt6/+sFEBzE cQButYrB1edThRjpCp8pF5qo9Ak3HS5Z/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgNwL8AeyUc2b45RkNFOw7UzB+0/cl6u6Wf+1B1JFe5uuV/luFVwj8AImMC/EHHy5Ky8hOHA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:794c:0:b029:30b:6792:3a45 with SMTP id u73-20020a62794c0000b029030b67923a45mr10348179pfc.46.1624914640927; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9200:a0f0:7ccb:5507:b206:6695? ([2601:646:9200:a0f0:7ccb:5507:b206:6695]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm15271447pgb.91.2021.06.28.14.10.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [OE-core] RFC: pulseaudio vs. meson vs. neon To: Phil Blundell Cc: Andrea Adami , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <6e2bcb94-8b02-50c1-bf5b-8fc3ce464d91@gmail.com> <20210628191055.GF5525@pbcl.net> <20210628195238.GG5525@pbcl.net> From: "Khem Raj" Organization: HIMVIS LLC Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:10:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210628195238.GG5525@pbcl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/28/21 12:52 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:42:55PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:10 PM Phil Blundell wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:46:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> I still hope that if we can add a proper neon detection patch to meson >>>> they would be ok to accept it. >>> >>> Why doesn't the runtime detection work in the way that upstream clearly >>> think it ought to? >> >> probably it does, someone has to test it on device without vfp. >> Currently it is still failing to compile. >> so first that needs to be fixed. > > Okay, but if the runtime detection does in fact work then there's no need > for any NEON detection in Meson, right? well, if we can beat the compiler to not complain about using neon on a non-neon system then yes, but changing float ABI to make compiler happy seems a bit iffy, since compiler will generate code expecting VFP and that could trip the system. > > p. >