From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5910D6086F for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:52:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Apr 2018 12:52:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,348,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="47242638" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2018 12:52:55 -0700 To: Marek Vasut , yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, mnhu@prevas.dk, raj.khem@gmail.com References: <20180408230223.17260-1-marex@denx.de> <53904a8f-7ba2-7f09-4e93-a95a780f60c7@denx.de> <8cc34667-5bb3-9642-40e2-d56b28f56646@prevas.dk> <32a348ed6176434db8178d29d7e1f183@SOC-EX01V.e01.socionext.com> <5ca366ed-3108-4a56-caaf-06b4f136d259@denx.de> <627e0fde-f97f-5c49-bc1a-325e7baa9072@linux.intel.com> <0802e876-fda0-d8d2-9dca-18ba8cbe073e@denx.de> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:46:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0802e876-fda0-d8d2-9dca-18ba8cbe073e@denx.de> Cc: otavio@ossystems.com.br, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2018.03 release X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:52:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/30/2018 08:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> Isn't it possible to solve your issue in the OE side? >>>> >>> >>> Can we NOT compile DTC alongside U-Boot somehow ? :) >>> That'd be the most desired solution IMO. >> >> Yes please. Can you adjust the recipes and classes in oe-core, and >> remove the dtc recipe altogether? > > Remove dtc recipe ? Not sure I understand what you're implying. If u-boot bundles dtc in its source tree, can we use that, and remove the external dtc recipe? Alex