From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BABEB64DC for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 06:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com (mail-ej1-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.1410.1689919656249062619 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:07:36 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=Y8Zue2D/; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.218.49, mailfrom: uvv.mail@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9926623e367so255396266b.0 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:07:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689919655; x=1690524455; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=8mR6Xdf8k16qpBL3l1UYY1R1AsQ+uHpkWLn6P3QRHrM=; b=Y8Zue2D/0LsierR9VHmGq9+mGwZfZ6pvX0u0h8uhfatJc6lK1dypeHet63Zx2fpZWI 5zg8kBYtkoFUTFro8CLNeVTw8PSb/Vjd5Ldx9Co3wRM0GC1eNgntEQtE5mVnr5ZudO4Z TdfpJ46+ZRCJ+3wJgkfTQMJU+pXlANodNp3LLo+03YpGaxMKvRBrWjG1UPXp0vm798AE K8fVo+x+r1k0+KNB+NrZgoXnbk2hySbl8jA7IoufawK2j2JDr44kJAtT847BYeGbWc1o G8KpFchNqXvv+SzE+SSupbYRymFgQSXajXz6tXfZMCon9tRdxYklp0VfMVk/m2qK9nk6 pa0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689919655; x=1690524455; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8mR6Xdf8k16qpBL3l1UYY1R1AsQ+uHpkWLn6P3QRHrM=; b=lXzt01chXfmPPgU9ymUIgWJXHiPMyvF7geXT384vYW32y3ONjlLz+V0tqiux8j9DQQ oi6wJ8mOxxJd9NknsIkA7xoFEAa7w4xO+3Xm5mRYbGbC+l7ZnvJtj79F4GsHfL72ixJl 8/2OPgS/gJTVBJoKXnlyYDRUZUMqMeog03oysewmCFN1y/kE9+7Yo3RVN/he7d1FrG+6 bw9e1ASRgt71skqssFIpM4dsT6SqUAaPXZy1tphYJaZMOwSqL45NnpPXRyULFyGGtKM6 h3AXoBpRjDodk7Oo1nt50NpdHDyHD6pz13+zS+V8NWjSZCCzHs0SG9RixjOGlNTgHuoK nsOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLa5NHRESJyW95MNykdNbZVOwSwczNaKrgzgYmNdAgWIoCdqWGkM CSyPIuETgjJrxXJ3Xv7jWlY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEBirRG78RMQ9ppYMfzEc0rxQ8woa7x36zOjS0vLK49d0Ww4fUqvom3Crv7bEB5Z2tf0w7Brw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:538a:b0:988:9621:d85f with SMTP id g10-20020a170906538a00b009889621d85fmr842180ejo.58.1689919654376; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.134.44.164] ([89.249.73.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j16-20020a170906051000b00993860a6d37sm1665640eja.40.2023.07.20.23.07.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------iL0xQsr0ln8DYrw9AgljD0l0" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:07:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade? Content-Language: en-US To: throos@amazon.de, "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" References: From: Vyacheslav Yurkov In-Reply-To: List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 06:07:38 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184668 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------iL0xQsr0ln8DYrw9AgljD0l0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would be cautious with boost upgrade in stable branch. Boost is known for having breaking changes almost each new version. I only had a glance at 1.79-1.81 https://www.boost.org/users/history/ and there are a couple of them. Are you affected by some particular bug or vulnerability in 1.78? Vyacheslav On 21.07.2023 06:49, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Hi, > we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and > how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch? > Cheers, Thomas > > > > > Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL > 38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg > Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg > eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284 > > Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland > Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen > Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen > eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB > 242240, USt-ID DE317013094 > > --------------iL0xQsr0ln8DYrw9AgljD0l0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I would be cautious with boost upgrade in stable branch.

Boost is known for having breaking changes almost each new version. I only had a glance at 1.79-1.81 https://www.boost.org/users/history/ and there are a couple of them.

Are you affected by some particular bug or vulnerability in 1.78?

Vyacheslav

On 21.07.2023 06:49, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote:

Hi,
we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?
Cheers, Thomas




Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 242240, USt-ID DE317013094


--------------iL0xQsr0ln8DYrw9AgljD0l0--