Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] wic/bootimg-efi: IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES added to separate bootimg-efi and bootimg-partition

["Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 16:13 +0800, Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat wrote:
> From: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin <
> khairul.rohaizzat.jamaluddin@intel.com>
> 
> Due to recent changes in bootimg-efi to include IMAGE_BOOT_FILES,
> when both bootimg-partition and bootimg-efi occur in a single .wks
> and IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are defined, files listed in IMAGE_BOOT_FILES
> will be duplicated in both partition.
> Since IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are crucial for bootimg-partition, but
> optional for bootimg-efi, hence allowing bootimg-efi to have the
> option
> to ignore it.
> 
> Added a new variable, IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES, to handle this
> issue. Its basic usage is the same as IMAGE_BOOT_FILES.
> Usage example:
>         IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES = "u-boot.img uImage;kernel"
>         IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES = "u-boot.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}
> ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}"
> 
> This commit is also squashed with the updated testcase to cover for
> this change.
> 
> [YOCTO #14011]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin <khairul.rohaizzat.jamaluddin@intel.com>

This looks like the right idea but it fails in testing:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/1280

Cheers,

Richard