From: "Luca Bocassi" <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add new recipe for squashfs-tools-ng
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:13:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe0fdbecda63255e6b15ff90df677989b5f4a579.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1sqeeYnhu_677KdPLeSa_D3mMJO6oPADEpxS0hVsaLH_Nw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 19:21 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:02 PM Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 16:58 +0100, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> > > From: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > The main difference with squashfs-tools is the availability
> > > of a shared library and a programmatic interface, rather
> > > than just command-line tools.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../squashfs-tools-ng_git.bb | 37
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools-ng/squashfs-
> > > tools-ng_git.bb
> >
> > Should we be switching over to squashfs-tools-ng and removing squashfs-
> > tools? I'm not sure we want to support both versions?
>
> I am not sure if we want to switch to ng yet as on option its good to
> have. Perhaps in meta-oe or some other place.
Yeah the command line interface is not a one-to-one mapping, so
probably best to keep both around.
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 15:58 [PATCH] Add new recipe for squashfs-tools-ng Luca Bocassi
2020-10-21 19:02 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2020-10-22 2:21 ` Khem Raj
2020-10-22 9:13 ` Luca Bocassi [this message]
2020-10-21 19:08 ` Konrad Weihmann
2020-10-22 9:21 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-22 9:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Luca Bocassi
2020-10-22 11:10 ` [OE-core] " Peter Kjellerstedt
2020-10-22 11:30 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-22 11:30 ` [PATCH v3] " Luca Bocassi
2020-10-22 19:10 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2020-10-23 8:57 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-24 12:58 ` Richard Purdie
2020-10-26 10:05 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v4] " Luca Bocassi
2020-10-26 10:29 ` Richard Purdie
2020-10-26 13:09 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-27 10:31 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-27 10:37 ` Richard Purdie
2020-10-27 10:59 ` Luca Bocassi
2020-10-27 11:19 ` [OE-core] " Ross Burton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe0fdbecda63255e6b15ff90df677989b5f4a579.camel@gmail.com \
--to=luca.boccassi@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox