Re: OE Github repositories

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Eggleton schreef op 28-04-14 13:08:
> On Monday 28 April 2014 12:43:58 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 28 apr. 2014, om 12:10 heeft Paul Eggleton
> <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> het volgende
> geschreven:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> Could whoever has admin access for the OpenEmbedded repositories on
>>> github please do two things:
>>> 
>>> 1) Stop having both "oe-core" and "openembedded-core" repositories -
>>> the latter is four months out-of-date. I'd suggest if we want to be
>>> consistent with our openembedded.org repos we should keep the
>>> "openembedded-core" repository and make it so it is kept up-to-date.
>>> 
>>> 2) Rename the "meta-oe" repository to "meta-openembedded", since
>>> meta-oe the layer is distinct from meta-openembedded the repository,
>>> and again this would be consistent with the primary repository
>>> naming.
>> 
>> Keep in mind that renaming/removing 'oe-core' and 'meta-oe' will
>> breaks things which use those repos to pull from by default. Which the
>> oe.org git server has improved a lot, it still can't beat githubs CDN.
> 
> OK then, how about this instead:
> 
> 1) Ensure the "openembedded-core" repository is kept up-to-date
> 
> 2) Add a "meta-openembedded" repository and ensure it is kept up-to-date
> 
> 3) Add a warning to the description for the contracted name repositories
> that the fully-named repositories should be used instead, so we can
> eventually drop them
> 
> 4) Change documentation / scripts to match #3

Sounds like a good plan to me!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFTXk1mMkyGM64RGpERAn8NAJ49r8TimCZIouIBM45jseXqA3xUCACdGPsh
jb5olKQRlsskP9x4vlmEIms=
=FqlW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----