From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.cvg.de (mail.cvg.de [62.153.82.30]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B486011F for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.12.76]) by mailout-1.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7SEKQ00028093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:20:27 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigma-chemnitz.de; s=v2012061000; t=1472394027; bh=vkBSqOB/K79R3FlwQnkTSMA9ngOzlpkuH1aXaeWM17U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender; b=mXnzu6AkW47Eie5zfcNV2CmrAb8t/CLpo+hjqbFlRpA7KOzmXIMECj5ptvVXsH4T9 ojEziS7JXLe8/xIhEIoiDTglI/Ys2dRdL4xCaFrThqO/0iw3WnQNWQdy4wzrB5MnuK RJM2BPsNJAYeJdlpxc5dUTidcZzaGHmRzHlVgRMs= Received: from reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.0.193]) by mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7SEK8Sv028923 for from enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:20:08 +0200 Received: from mail-msa-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de ( [192.168.12.77]) by reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (Reddoxx engine) with SMTP id 68BEF8F3727; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:19:33 +0200 Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail-msa-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7SEJoBT028916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:19:50 +0200 Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1be0wA-00051B-45; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:19:50 +0200 From: Enrico Scholz To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1470821429-6094-1-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> <1470821429-6094-8-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Enrico Scholz Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:19:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1470821429-6094-8-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> (Maxin B. John's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:30:26 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Enrico Scholz X-Spam-Score: -0.3 X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 Cc: "Maxin B. John" Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] tslib: remove recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:20:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain "Maxin B. John" writes: > Modern systems generally use the kernel driver or libinput instead This is wrong. afaik, 'tslib' is more or less mandatory for systems with resistive touchscreens (which are often used in industrial environments). Kernel interface does not suffice there because values *must* be calibrated (usually per device and periodically since parameters change with time) and "smoothed". Enrico