From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC19C433EF for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.cvg.de (smtpout.cvg.de [87.128.211.67]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.13407.1644001254606908227 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 11:00:56 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@sigma-chemnitz.de header.s=v2012061000 header.b=QknQKCjw; spf=pass (domain: sigma-chemnitz.de, ip: 87.128.211.67, mailfrom: enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de) Received: from mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.12.70]) by mail-out-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 214J0pOs114834 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:00:51 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigma-chemnitz.de; s=v2012061000; t=1644001251; bh=ku5XyeugdGUXbquYOi7p+exfhXg+PZnQeGgkPnz1ykk=; l=796; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QknQKCjw6Oatfh7p3EyKLO0Mm+apQhlX6wyqjOTtW1DBE8jqtbpNzG9AZMXSmqd5D IlHWp2hBdh40oGZsJ4cE7pVBQmKDO+rGAKu3vWal86xrw0dRYv2BJt52QptBkjPSzH Qt/B4o68JRafKUsx3eA9Yg8jMX4ptYxZrZ4rY8CY= Received: from reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (reddoxx.sigma.local [192.168.16.32]) by mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 214J0n3N153754 for from enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:00:49 +0100 Received: from mail-msa-3.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de ( [192.168.12.73]) by reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (Reddoxx engine) with SMTP id 23CCE1D6F96; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:00:48 +0100 Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail-msa-3.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 214J0mpj115952 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:00:48 +0100 Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nG3p9-005hfn-Oj; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 20:00:47 +0100 From: Enrico Scholz To: Richard Purdie Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: enable zstd compression of LTO bytecode References: <20220203172619.1299363-1-enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 20:00:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Richard Purdie's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2022 21:59:16 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: Enrico Scholz List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:00:57 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/161379 Richard Purdie writes: >> | lto1: internal compiler error: original not compressed with zstd >> >> DEPENDS =+ "mpfr gmp libmpc zlib flex-native" >> -NATIVEDEPS = "mpfr-native gmp-native libmpc-native zlib-native flex-native" >> +NATIVEDEPS = "mpfr-native gmp-native libmpc-native zlib-native flex-native zstd-native" >> >> LICENSE = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception & GPLv3" >> > > Should we be passing some flag to gcc explicitly to configure this > deterministicly? Both '--with-zstd' and '--without-zstd' make it deterministic (require zstd.h and abort when non-existing resp. ignore it when existing). Perhaps '--without-zstd' should be added in the hardknott and honister branches to prevent pollution by host environment. Enrico