From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4HW1-0002a5-Ba for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:27:02 +0200 Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail.cvg.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7MKEm6S027398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:14:50 +0200 Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T4HKZ-0002IC-Hz for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:15:11 +0200 From: Enrico Scholz To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Enrico Scholz X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Probability: 0 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.99 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 X-Spam-Level: ----- X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL,DSPAM_INNOCENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 Subject: libgcc_s.so not stripped X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:27:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a difference of more than 1 MB. Enrico