From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] local.conf.sample: Add automatic defaults for BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:00:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lybnym4v2f.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F11C55.10108@windriver.com> (Mark Hatle's message of "Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:59:01 -0600")
Mark Hatle <mark.hatle-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>> I've noticed that after 4 threads IO becomes a big bottleneck when
>>> you have things like webkit, qt, asio etc in the buildqueue. Combine
>>> that with issues like every make -j thread taking >2GB ram with asio
>>> and webkit this default seems a bit high. I'd use 0.5*numcpu with a
>>> lower bound of 2.
>>
>> limitting the load mitigates this (high i/o increases it); e.g.
>>
>> PARALLEL_MAKE = "\
>> ...
>> -l ${@int(os.sysconf(os.sysconf_names['SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN'])) * 150/100} \
>> "
>
> FYI, I think this points out the variability in system performance,
> between CPU, RAM and I/o.
>
> As it stands the patch gives my machine the best performance. So I
> like it as it is.
Point of my posting was not the exact scale (I just copied a piece of
my ~/.bitbake.conf), but using '-l' in addition to '-j'. Doing heavy
i/o or being low on RAM (which causes swapping) increases the load and
'make' will throttle then.
> No setting is going to make everyone happy but something has to be
> better then defaulting to '1'.
That's true; but not due to performance gain but because it will help to
detect races in the build process.
Enrico
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 14:39 [PATCH] local.conf.sample: Add automatic defaults for BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE Richard Purdie
2014-01-27 16:45 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-01-27 17:23 ` Stewart, David C
2014-01-27 17:25 ` Burton, Ross
2014-01-28 10:08 ` Koen Kooi
2014-01-28 10:41 ` Richard Purdie
2014-01-29 12:09 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2014-01-29 12:56 ` Richard Purdie
2014-01-29 13:32 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2014-01-29 14:44 ` Ross Burton
2014-02-01 9:21 ` Mike Looijmans
2014-02-03 21:23 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2014-02-03 23:34 ` Richard Purdie
2014-02-04 16:13 ` Enrico Scholz
2014-02-04 16:59 ` Mark Hatle
2014-02-04 18:00 ` Enrico Scholz [this message]
2014-01-29 10:14 ` Steffen Sledz
2014-01-29 10:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2014-01-29 11:42 ` Steffen Sledz
2014-01-29 10:59 ` Richard Purdie
2014-01-29 11:47 ` Steffen Sledz
2014-01-29 11:52 ` Paul Eggleton
2014-01-29 12:46 ` Steffen Sledz
2014-01-29 16:39 ` Laszlo Papp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lybnym4v2f.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de \
--to=enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox