From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuPHy-0002TM-MY for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:43:42 +0200 Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail.cvg.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6QEW9C5011903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:11 +0200 Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SuP6n-0006Kk-EE for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:09 +0200 From: Enrico Scholz To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1343283462-25435-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> <5010E3CF.3060709@intel.com> <919CF905-E475-44CE-8050-94A39C204208@dominion.thruhere.net> <501144FE.4040201@intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <501144FE.4040201@intel.com> (Radu Moisan's message of "Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:24:14 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Enrico Scholz X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Probability: 0 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.99 X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: ----- X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,DSPAM_INNOCENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dbus: include dbus-launch in the main dbus package X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:43:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Radu Moisan writes: > it does not crash at runtime. I do not speak about crash; I guess 'dbus-launch' has some extra functionality when compiled with x11 support, and packages which depend on dbus-x11 might expect this functionality. Providing 'dbus-x11' although no x11 functionality is provided sounds wrong to me. Either remove the 'dbus-x11' property completely or provide it only when x11 support is built in. Enrico