From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1Sssoe-0004cL-NQ
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:51:08 +0200
Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de
	(ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24])
	by mail.cvg.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6M9dbEh017552
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:39:38 +0200
Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim
	4.76) (envelope-from <ensc@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1SssdV-0005tg-Hy
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:39:37 +0200
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
References: <1342871746-14583-1-git-send-email-enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
	<1342946469.21788.54.camel@ted>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:39:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1342946469.21788.54.camel@ted> (Richard Purdie's message of
	"Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:41:09 +0100")
Message-ID: <lyipdg878m.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.99
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level: -----
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,DSPAM_INNOCENT
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake: do not set CCACHE_DISABLE=0
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:51:08 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain

Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
writes:

>> ccache checks for existence of environment; not for its value:
>> ...
>> Hence, avoid setting of $CCACHE_DISABLE instead of assigning '0'.
>
> Why doesn't CCACHE_DISABLE[unexport] = "1" help here?

You mean, keeping the

 | export CCACHE_DISABLE ??= "${@[0,1][d.getVar('CCACHE', True) == '']}"

and requesting explicitly that user specifies

 | CCACHE_DISABLE[unexport] = "1"

in his .conf?  Sounds hacky and inconsistent and makes it impossible to
set CCACHE_DISABLE by external environment.


> Doesn't the unexport flag stop this entering the environment?

Perhaps.  In the current bitbake, 'unexport' takes precedence over
'export'.  But is this specified somewhere and will perhaps be changed
in a later version.



Enrico