From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1SVOuv-0000E6-D1
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Fri, 18 May 2012 17:16:48 +0200
Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de
	(ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24])
	by mail.cvg.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IF6R17031258
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 18 May 2012 17:06:28 +0200
Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim
	4.76) (envelope-from <ensc@sigma-chemnitz.de>)
	id 1SVOl8-0002Nb-RO; Fri, 18 May 2012 17:06:27 +0200
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
References: <1337187331-4945-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org>
	<89109968-DC24-477E-9E9D-2F255D1EB93B@dominion.thruhere.net>
	<4FB3F434.2040703@opendreambox.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:06:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4FB3F434.2040703@opendreambox.org> (Andreas Oberritter's message
	of "Wed, 16 May 2012 20:38:44 +0200")
Message-ID: <lymx55fs0d.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.99
X-Spam-Score: -5.3
X-Spam-Level: -----
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,DSPAM_INNOCENT
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73
Cc: Andreas Oberritter <obi-Le4rqY8tBtjh/77Yhslz0w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avahi-systemd: drop postrm, use prerm instead
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:16:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Andreas Oberritter <obi-Le4rqY8tBtjh/77Yhslz0w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> What's the use case for removing packages offline

I am developing very much with NFS root filesystems (--> the temporary
image directory which is kept by IMAGE_KEEPROOTFS=1).  Packaging operations
like install, remove or upgrade are common actions to test recipes and
applications.


Enrico