From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.cvg.de (mail.cvg.de [62.153.82.30]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE6A731DB for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.12.76]) by mailout-1.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7MBLlWS024563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:47 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigma-chemnitz.de; s=v2012061000; t=1471864908; bh=KlmghrDcfH6vzPcFIob4nf1Q/CWLAk1TmpqQ97M10Sg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender; b=ESMsIJTKniNP24GZgNIXPutOWwMG5TdOwNpT0WAcAmKQ3fIzwiWft54fYNu075qbF 3mwtIsSJ3wVu5ZYKCXqglZSw7g7A25QYgFdd0Zlg2tjrSt9pOqNEqpBCBqNcXkgXQr ZE4hfP4nJY1CsrJhLTeoYT4OzzZ4agkvbf28aEbY= Received: from reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.0.193]) by mail-mta-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7MBLTSE014671 for from enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:30 +0200 Received: from mail-msa-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de ( [192.168.12.77]) by reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (Reddoxx engine) with SMTP id E6E0F8454B; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:21 +0200 Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail-msa-0.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7MBLSTx014668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:28 +0200 Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbnIG-0005DF-0Z; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:28 +0200 From: Enrico Scholz To: "Burton\, Ross" References: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:21:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Ross Burton's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:18:22 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Enrico Scholz X-Spam-Score: 2.1 X-Spam-Level: ## X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ncurses: upgrade to 6.0+20160625 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:21:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain "Burton, Ross" writes: >> This breaks the build with OE because it tries to split our $CC. >> E.g. with >> >> | CC = ccache arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7ve ... --sysroot=... >> >> configure will warn >> >> | your environment misuses the CC variable to hold CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS options >> >> and messes up CFLAGS completely so that 'arm-linux-gnuebi-gcc' becomes >> part of it :( >> > ncurses isn't the first recipe we've had to patch over this... ncurses is ugly because it uses its own private version of autoconf. We will have to patch a lot of (compiled) 'configure' scripts, or (which I prefer) create a local wrapper script for $CC. I wrote an upstream bug report ([1]), but it probably has to go through moderation first and is not visible yet. Enrico Footnotes: [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/