Re: STAGING_BINDIR

[Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>]

I now have two rough patches:

http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/stage-bindir1.patch

which just renames variables. Should be safe to apply with a change to
add the new names to bitbake.conf. I will probably apply this soon
(Monday evening?) unless anyone objects. I don't fancy having this lying
around for long.

http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/stage-bindir2.patch

These are the more invasive changes or need special handling.

Of all the references to STAGING_BINDIR I filtered, these were the two
I didn't like the look of or understand:

These look totally wrong:
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb:    install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/rcc ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb:    install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/moc ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb:    install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/uic ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb:    install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/qmake ${STAGING_BINDIR}

And I have no idea what this is doing but it looks wrong:
./packages/uqm/uqm_0.3.bb:      ./build-opts.sh ${STAGING_DIR} ${STAGING_BINDIR} ${STAGING_LIBDIR}
./packages/uqm/uqm_0.5.0.bb:    ./build-opts.sh ${STAGING_DIR} ${STAGING_BINDIR} ${STAGING_LIBDIR}

If anyone fancies trying a build from scratch with both patches applied
for their favourite packages/images, particularly e-image, feedback
would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Richard