From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: To be removed recipes
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:09:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165496944.5601.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45780B2E.4020906@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl>
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:38 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > In case people didn't notice,
> > http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
> > which will be removed on the specified dates.
>
> Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.
> Package Name: Maemo
> Reason: Unfetchable, obsoleted by IT2006 release.
I don't know what we should do with these for the best. The end result
will be maemo being near enough totally removed from OE which sends out
the wrong message. I would ultimately like to see maemo in OE...
Maybe a contender for moving to non-working?
> Package Name: task-bootstrap*
> Reason: Obsoleted by task-base
Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...
> Package Name: bluez*2.*
> Reason: Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7
Fine with me.
> Package Name: mono
> Reason: Obsolete version - 1.2 is current, 1.0 is not fetchable
non-working - ultimately we probably want mono
> Package Name: zeecookbook
> Reason: Not maintained upstream, not fetchable
Fine with me.
> Package Name: qpe-vexed
> Reason: Not fetchable, all search results points to OE related infos
Fine with me.
> Package Name: ipac-ng
> Reason: Depends on libgd-perl which is not in metada
> Package Name:
? (there are two of these)
> Package Name: nsqld
> Reason: Never used
Fine with me.
> Package Name: gpe-mileage
> Reason: Unfinished, no development progress
Fine with me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-07 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-27 16:09 To be removed recipes Koen Kooi
2006-12-07 12:38 ` Koen Kooi
2006-12-07 13:09 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2006-12-08 16:11 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2006-12-11 20:52 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-08 16:59 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2006-12-10 22:31 ` Richard Purdie
2006-12-11 20:50 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-11 21:26 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2006-12-12 13:47 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-16 10:55 ` Koen Kooi
2006-12-16 14:23 ` Robert Woerle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-18 9:08 Martyn Welch
2006-12-18 11:59 ` Rolf Leggewie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1165496944.5601.32.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox