Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: To be removed recipes
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:09:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165496944.5601.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45780B2E.4020906@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl>

On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:38 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > In case people didn't notice,
> > http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
> > which will be removed on the specified dates.
> 
> Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.

> Package Name:   Maemo
> Reason:         Unfetchable, obsoleted by IT2006 release.

I don't know what we should do with these for the best. The end result
will be maemo being near enough totally removed from OE which sends out
the wrong message. I would ultimately like to see maemo in OE...

Maybe a contender for moving to non-working?

> Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
> Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base

Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...

> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7               

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   mono
> Reason:         Obsolete version - 1.2 is current, 1.0 is not fetchable

non-working - ultimately we probably want mono
 
> Package Name:   zeecookbook
> Reason:         Not maintained upstream, not fetchable

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   qpe-vexed
> Reason:         Not fetchable, all search results points to OE related infos

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   ipac-ng
> Reason:         Depends on libgd-perl which is not in metada

> Package Name:   
? (there are two of these)
 
> Package Name:   nsqld
> Reason:		Never used

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   gpe-mileage
> Reason:         Unfinished, no development progress

Fine with me.




  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-07 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-27 16:09 To be removed recipes Koen Kooi
2006-12-07 12:38 ` Koen Kooi
2006-12-07 13:09   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2006-12-08 16:11     ` Paul Sokolovsky
2006-12-11 20:52       ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-08 16:59     ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2006-12-10 22:31       ` Richard Purdie
2006-12-11 20:50         ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-11 21:26           ` Paul Sokolovsky
2006-12-12 13:47     ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-12-16 10:55     ` Koen Kooi
2006-12-16 14:23       ` Robert Woerle
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-18  9:08 Martyn Welch
2006-12-18 11:59 ` Rolf Leggewie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1165496944.5601.32.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox