From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HlOpw-00042x-To for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 14:30:38 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l48CU9PS005822 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:30:09 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05680-03 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:30:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from max.rpnet.com (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l48CU5NK005803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 13:30:05 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions In-Reply-To: <432beae0705062129i11f69731n1d12777f46a83316@mail.gmail.com> References: <35653307.20070503154732@gmail.com> <1178198199.6312.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <432beae0705062129i11f69731n1d12777f46a83316@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:30:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1178627405.6061.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [ALERT] Security vulnerability with recent OE bitbake.conf changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:30:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 21:29 -0700, Justin Patrin wrote: > Ummm...where? I tried that in my local.conf and it did nothing. I've > also grepped for PATCH_RESOLVER in both bitbake and oe and found > nothing. Sorry, it should be PATCHRESOLVE = "noop", my memory is playing tricks. > Please, let's remove the gnome-terminal default, it makes no sense to > assume that the lowest common denominator is running bitbake from X... "noop" should be the default. There is no good argument for which terminal UI should/shouldn't be the default. Ideally I guess it would autoselect unless the user specifies, I'll give that some thought. A warning from sanity.bbclass about a missing command might be good too... Cheers, Richard