From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ICvLS-00012m-0B for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:40:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6NAdinD015037; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:44 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14892-03; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6NAdaNp015021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:36 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: "Dr. Mickey Lauer" , angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org In-Reply-To: <782493793.20070723025335@vanille-media.de> References: <1736781229.20070723004348@gmail.com> <46A3D22A.20502@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <782493793.20070723025335@vanille-media.de> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1185187176.6148.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Subject: Re: [Angstrom-devel] Legends, legends all around X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:40:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 02:53 +0200, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > *sigh* > > WTF is happening here? I don't know who did what and actually to be > honest, I don't care, because I don't think we have enough resources > to let such valuable contributors go away -- no matter how this > incident started and who is responsible. > > That makes me sad. You're not the only one. Rolf is (or was? :-( ) a valuable contributor and I not happy he's felt he had to leave. It looks like acts from both sides contributed towards this although I'm not going any further into it as I don't think it will help. Given certain past experiences at least one side should have known better, stepped back and asked someone else to mediate or at least acted differently. As a note to everyone else, if you are having problems with anyone else on any project, do please talk to one of the other devs and see if the situation can be solved *before* people feel their only option is to walk out. I know my time is limited and I can't watch as many mailing lists as closely as I'd like but am prepared to try help when pointed at something and I suspect this applies to other devs too. Richard - equally sad :-(