From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IW72x-0005ag-Ig; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:01:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8E8vYQ5020498; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:34 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19998-06; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8E8vQ2p020490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:26 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <522721688.20070914040225@vanille-media.de> References: <8e53a5920709112139s1b54c4cdsdb27b0df1995399e@mail.gmail.com> <7215-66668@sneakemail.com> <8742-19702@sneakemail.com> <164986939.20070914021814@vanille-media.de> <46E9D4BA.3080708@balister.org> <522721688.20070914040225@vanille-media.de> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1189760245.6181.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Using OE Subject: Re: [oe-users] ERROR: function do_stage failed X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:01:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 04:02 +0200, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > The more Angstrom-specific hacks I see in OpenEmbedded, the more it > scares me, because this means once someone wants a lean-and-mean way > to compile a distro, he will run into lots of obstacles which -- > in my opinion -- should rather be solved in a distribution-independent way. Can you give some examples of these as I wasn't aware of this :/ Cheers, Richard