From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Md409-0006d6-9z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:20:04 +0200 Received: from castle.reciva.com ([82.71.203.193] helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Md3je-0001m5-SN for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:59 +0100 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Md3je-0008Mm-JJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:58 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1250521270.27980.6.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> References: <4A8960BC.4000603@cam.ac.uk> <200908171606.57153.holger+oe@freyther.de> <1250521270.27980.6.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1250521375.27980.8.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.7 and 2.9 (arm): Remove unnecessary asm/page.h include X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:20:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 16:01 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 16:06 +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > To be honest I wonder why you are triggering this area, and why other builds > > don't do that... it is a bit frightening. > > I expect it's nothing more sinister than different versions of > linux-libc-headers. was there in 2.6.23 but, it seems, > gone by 2.6.29. So, probably no cause for alarm. Oh, and, as for bumping PR: in this case I would suggest not doing it. The output binaries should be identical with and without that header, and for folks doing online upgrades it is a bit of a pain to have glibc rebuild unnecessarily. p.