From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdNPE-0002yC-9D for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:03:13 +0200 Received: from castle.reciva.com ([82.71.203.193] helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MdN8W-0001NN-NM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:45:56 +0100 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MdN8T-0003ct-PT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:45:54 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1250591188.3555.5.camel@utx.utx.cz> References: <1250551346.5083.3@zaurus> <1250591188.3555.5.camel@utx.utx.cz> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:45:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1250595950.27980.68.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Subject: Re: xtscal fails + other Xorg init problems. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:03:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 12:26 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote: > That is why I would like to propose: > - remove all xcalibrate and xcalibrabrateext recipes > - find recipes and images that need them and migrate them to > libxcalibrate and calibrateproto. > - fix git versioning of libxcalibrate and calibrateproto, maybe > increment PE. Yes, that sounds reasonable enough. I'm not quite sure how we ended up with these multiple competing recipes for the same thing but clearly there is no benefit to having them. The only thing to watch out for would be the backwards compatibility symlink for the pkgconfig data. p.