From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKkO-0000Pi-Jq for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:49:59 +0200 Received: from castle.reciva.com ([82.71.203.193] helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKjz-000783-UE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:49:32 +0100 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKjz-0006Qs-MD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:49:31 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <4AA758CC.7030505@gmail.com> References: <4AA758CC.7030505@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:49:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1252493367.27780.741.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.71.203.194 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philb@gnu.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix netsurf touchscreen behaviour. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:49:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 16:57 +0930, Graham Gower wrote: > As per http://vlists.pepperfish.net/pipermail/netsurf-dev-netsurf-browser.org/2009-September/001588.html Is this damaging for non-touchscreen users? It wasn't completely obvious to me from the patch what effect it would have in that case. p.