Re: SCM fetched recipes without a SRCREV - e.g. libgee-native

[Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>]

On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:59 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 07:57:40PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:42 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> > > > If we continue down the sane-srcrevs.inc route we should consider moving 
> > > > PV_pn into there as well. Having SRCREV and PN in 2 different places 
> > > > only adds confusion and leads to misversions.
> > > 
> > > Correct.
> > > 
> > > > Speaking of misversioning, I should really go through all scm fetched 
> > > > packages I use and verify PV is correct for those.
> > > 
> > > Agreed, will have to do the same here.
> > 
> > Can I also suggest we start using SRCPV in PV, not SRCREV? This removed
> > the need to play a lot of games with PV...
> > 
> > (Poky has switched to this now)
> 
> AFAIK, it's not merged in OE yet. I would definitely like to see it in OE.
> Last time we discussed it, the agreement was to introduce SRCPV in 
> bitbake.conf first and then gradually switch existing recipes over from 
> SRCREV, instead of mass-updating all of them at once...

Either way is fine but this looks like a good time to think about it if
we're already assessing the variables!

Cheers,

Richard