Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Blundell <pb@reciva.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Revert "package bbclass: strip static libs as well"
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:42:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256301732.4529.161.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hbs7hq$j3v$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 14:28 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -libc_baselibs = "${base_libdir}/libcrypt*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libcrypt-*.so ${base_libdir}/libc*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libc-*.so ${base_libdir}/libm*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libm-*.so ${base_libdir}/ld*.so.* ${base_libdir}/ld-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libpthread*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libpthread-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libresolv*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libresolv-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/librt*.so.* ${base_libdir}/librt-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libutil*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libutil-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnsl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnsl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_files*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_files-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_compat*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_compat-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_dns*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_dns-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libdl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libdl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libanl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libanl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libBrokenLocale*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libBrokenLocale-*.so"
> +libc_baselibs = "${base_libdir}/libcrypt*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libcrypt-*.so ${base_libdir}/libc*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libc-*.so ${base_libdir}/libm*.so.* 
> ${base_libdir}/libm-*.so ${base_libdir}/ld*.so.* ${base_libdir}/ld-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libpthread*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libpthread-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libresolv*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libresolv-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/librt*.so.* ${base_libdir}/librt-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libutil*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libutil-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnsl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnsl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_files*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_files-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_compat*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_compat-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libnss_dns*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libnss_dns-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libdl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libdl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libanl*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libanl-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libBrokenLocale*.so.* ${base_libdir}/libBrokenLocale-*.so 
> ${base_libdir}/libcidn-*.so  ${base_libdir}/libmemusage.so"

It took me a moment to spot what was actually happening here, but I
think this is a step in the wrong direction.  Libmemusage is not
something that most folks are going to want in their rootfs; libcidn is
a bit more debatable but I suspect that at least some people will view
it as bloat.  I would prefer to see the glibc packaging becoming less
rather than more monolithic and I think these two libraries would be
better placed in their own subpackages.

(Also, as an aside, this part of the patch doesn't seem to have anything
to do with the static libs and it should probably not be bundled into
the same changeset.)

p.





  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-23  3:04 Revert "package bbclass: strip static libs as well" Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23  7:23 ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23  7:30   ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23  7:58     ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23  8:23       ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23  8:36         ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-23  9:14           ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23  9:33             ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23  9:46               ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23  9:54                 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23 10:03                   ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23 10:24                   ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-23 11:07                 ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-23 11:34                   ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-23 22:31                     ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-24  0:29                       ` Khem Raj
2009-10-24  8:48                       ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-24 13:27                         ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-24 14:13                           ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-24 14:33                             ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-24 14:57                           ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-24 14:06                         ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-24 15:18                           ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-24 15:39                           ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-24 18:45                             ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-24 19:33                               ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-10-23 12:11                   ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-10-23 12:12                   ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-23 12:28               ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23 12:37                 ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-23 12:42                 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2009-10-23 12:56                   ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-24  2:32                     ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-24  3:42                       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-10-24  8:40                       ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-23 18:21                   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-10-23 18:36                     ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-23 19:53             ` Khem Raj
2009-10-23 18:26           ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-10-27  9:38 ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-27 10:21   ` Phil Blundell
2009-10-27 10:29     ` Koen Kooi
2009-10-27 10:50   ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-10-27 11:24     ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256301732.4529.161.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com \
    --to=pb@reciva.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox