From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.reciva.com ([109.169.29.93] helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob6yy-00067c-7g for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:11:17 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.10]) by crown.reciva.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob6yn-0004gZ-6K for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:11:05 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1279527857-12295-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1279570852.21888.123.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:11:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1279609876.21888.132.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 109.169.29.93 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philb@gnu.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sane-toolchain.inc: THUMB_INTERWORK should not be defined for armv4 and add armv4 to ARM EABI supporting architectures. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:11:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 15:49 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > and I think the oldest arm architecture we support is armv4 which means we may > not need this check at all anymore. Yeah, that might well be right. I had thought there were some ARM710 (which is armv3) machines supported, but I can't see any trace of them now so either I imagined it or they have been deleted. p.