From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Jose Lamego <jose.a.lamego@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
"Lamego, Jose A" <jose.a.lamego@intel.com>,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Patchwork not picking changes from the ML
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:21:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487946072.10512.9.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26abf96d-d224-0795-4870-cdd496f541de@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 15:56 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2017 02:55 PM, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > I've seen several issues with hooks. I was working on them yesterday and
> > will continue today.
> >
> > These are currently managed by hand but we are moving them into
> > configuration management which should help keep them working consistently.
>
> Michael: one syntax error in patchwork code was pulled into production
> yesterday. This is the cause for missing patches. The error is fixed in
> the Yocto repo now, please perform a server code update ASAP.
>
> Martin: I will look at the UI issue you are describing and file a bug if
> needed.
Would it perhaps make sense to reply to the original author with an
email confirming that his patch is now in Patchwork? It should include a
link to the patch series, too.
This could have several advantages:
* submitters not aware of Patchwork or whether their target
currently uses it learn about it and then can follow the
progress of their patch
* everyone gets a confirmation that the submission made it through
the various mail servers and Patchwork itself
It still relies on the original submitter to watch out for breakages in
the processes, but I guess that can't be avoided with an asynchronous,
mail-based process.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 17:45 [meta-python][PATCH] python-paho-mqtt: update to version 1.2 Derek Straka
2017-02-22 20:47 ` Patchwork not picking changes from the ML Was: " Martin Jansa
2017-02-22 20:55 ` [OE-core] " Michael Halstead
2017-02-22 21:56 ` Jose Lamego
2017-02-24 14:21 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-02-22 21:56 ` Derek Straka
2017-02-22 22:08 ` Michael Halstead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487946072.10512.9.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=jose.a.lamego@intel.com \
--cc=jose.a.lamego@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox