From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76337762D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m27so15928657iti.1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DPJAnxWHzIWUecEuKccLvHOsB+ii9jqIRY5GCBz4I4=; b=in0Iwr2XiS73nK+F2IYXoVyZCpJ/sdJMZJxu2fZqVvWydE95Dq5e0IvzLA4Wcl1vks qWT/rU09Z1Fn2Le4FEaGuN7TeI4k4nMuC9awaTiI0XVUKNSLjKFravpgIRUxP+uwL6l5 40cssy+J03VCBsRhDdvIy7Hd4t9NDQOeAMxYdUlS9bBtQ8qfffVMoxnFsnC7nW3pmhVE n8GsHPsjFeT14Lc3cBJhyvSj/p20qrjU8Lr1lCaIorQd8ovx7T71jSZ9gUF/KkwdM0uj ZahaTWtEh8sVhDNddcFPyGAAsZBe9q+bX0onsqaBXzDxg3T5FDdRdYXPt4PG2h+foj71 nUbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DPJAnxWHzIWUecEuKccLvHOsB+ii9jqIRY5GCBz4I4=; b=efzYBBoABC8xgMCKvssgIbdVn+hTBatg85H13qVvpPPQL0NGqGZpVt8XBMlrT/FCUg 0zuuChp54YEUiIzBMufHu0Ro1GoyQmIGGDiPZUdm5FAJiI6pajMeIdIYntGbkKx9b46K 6eg6Q0HRxKHGTGELLFgoSt78ZuyzaL/0q0O9dIzdp/ebEsffhyJvsTt8xazNyc2n/W20 ZuKV5If71WrjzsR8f38j5nrOT8UlVJv6DTgBwosKeMZqluNpwY3JK7FW36XAUa3DTIOX WIjrZDB4C/+BGrh/wjL6DwhMhN7mzYwCpb1XYOCXvAi9gTHGG6u12OMqwl8UPUXMf8Tw /Q4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H21rH3qqMHqxgb71syG6NNzlzDCHmwRDfWN1H3hvkZI5fSoMS63sJKFOudxSjCg97SR X-Received: by 10.36.213.3 with SMTP id a3mr4099072itg.30.1489572063558; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DCEB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e195sm6484847itb.18.2017.03.15.03.01.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1489572060.6396.90.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:01:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170315094841.4126-1-patrick.ohly@intel.com> References: <20170315094841.4126-1-patrick.ohly@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] yocto-compat-layer: improve error handling in signature creation X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:01:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 10:48 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > When "bitbake -k -S none world" failed, the error printed by > yocto-compat-layer.py contained the stack trace multiple times and did not > contain the stderr output from bitbake, making the error hard to understand > and debug Sorry, wrong list. I closed the patch in patchwork, too. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.