From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF137769E for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m27so48421379iti.1 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+8r57kwCgoYdSQLOEUSAo05nA8tFHWPcuzn4jnY+DVU=; b=oxT2xmh5hs+8nHa3OC8EIYLK4xXc8r2VGA16eAD2tJmcFgtJsbqrjLlrtXCpvC71uc jxHhK5HLpiMuB5tk9dZbhA6w0jDvnQFnM/bobgrpXk+WXIohW51aWM/xaCctqih8ukaM HbgoQL9ATryGl5kaune9D7WJDMK08Dlybenv2/t0yzwOJixoEcWHH6qaJRkg585kTkWm emnSqlCh08xQRMOBxf2XidM/fmRx/LsrLLegujVCmvAm4KPmoAvP2FyYvs6RW2Wm5mFv cmDz8sfY7mlLxHfG6I1/B23Pb1pQG34qY3+3HssYDyg0BW378CMKTK0FbAZ9CO6EMota 7exw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+8r57kwCgoYdSQLOEUSAo05nA8tFHWPcuzn4jnY+DVU=; b=PNERHmZCuoRJLZwHmgWfdnHdtUEm0zdrM+zt61Oxk1ClmaBZr45bZ+nypBNF4t4eo5 ALNtNNKxZISGP9IBNrQ80bOVMsyJTp54bBniDcBPx5D72+4/hOmPVsZzynPlhryKAAeL 0SislN6RFNkzZ7h7LrDD4CR+7dOdARqNWzSNsNpuUSTtcfCbNQBgBt+dUtKL0juN0TM3 ETNkavbUs3c6aoqmiVEkmMViaIc4d7MnRDmOzkJAhHoTQ9Ua9Dmo428FIzDb3vj9N2zX skAzUcQy7TyXYbk8WO1dk0iqDhF3XnB7ncUcaU/nZjwZYcOBdcAI14l/tGTmbk2wlP36 Yw9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0E1fMGV1FJzJKMoWiEl/7fL/m9w2P/D6B8EXFdHxaMZqf2IaU0ntlt6wNchRDjTrcJ X-Received: by 10.36.213.196 with SMTP id a187mr25777578itg.4.1489678957070; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DCA9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z204sm3109397iod.3.2017.03.16.08.42.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1489678953.6396.121.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Peter Kjellerstedt Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:42:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170218021012.31978-8-pkj@axis.com> References: <20170218021012.31978-1-pkj@axis.com> <20170218021012.31978-8-pkj@axis.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 8/8] lvm2: Move libdevmapper to a separate package X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:42:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 03:10 +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > This allows, e.g., cryptsetup to use libdevmapper without having to > pull in all of lvm2. I'm experiencing an issue where both kpartx and cryptsetup hang infinitely. For kpartx, I traced it down to the lack of dmsetup udev rules in the rootfs, the same problem as in https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/22025#issuecomment-243943728 Adding lvm2 to my image fixed it, but that defeats the purpose of this patch... ;-} Peter, do you know which parts of lvm2 are needed for kpartx +libdevicemapper to work correctly? My initial attempt with moving just the udev rules to the libdevicemapper packages was either flawed or incomplete. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.