From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DAC65D00 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y18so49067935itc.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0LIuyGQ/YDB54r08cjDdh+YKAm7vTKGh1OePv61umJo=; b=WsYu2RzhCGBsAYTcIVnplou+eOfF/Wy5/RpV1qd9uPbUt0vc7VfJqJDWP2d8egAlXz Vb3Wotr9a+jETxncvtgDwB6NzL6TIO6eOhhMce2MfVOnCJwneI8/6lbsFJwPVp2Frz/3 Gby6M1p5k4zWXcnDXYwI86SFSfF+I8OcGWtpc1GbbcnIB/eS0y615YG8tZ6CAn8+qAPi F6gkUzBehLUmNOXqDgIPSmta6ebQEgRZ0sUTo7OoKCRdZvR2FYLAyd3st2tZrfa6ucaF l0WF1oPCjybfBgo0+MHNwmQpLdNTLSzMfAcWKy9nbE7jk+qowQNnbzxXka+PhgHHvykx qp6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0LIuyGQ/YDB54r08cjDdh+YKAm7vTKGh1OePv61umJo=; b=JBO42bURQH0Cg4dSSEKIwAyhabarxhAeHcT+G9gTwJ5eQpbo+k7YK1uQ5Is6JZmTCQ YNFuW/YLnuYGO3vtwUGjvVpSn5cWOl/Sfp3QKv8a4r8ueGIhLMHlqI89uwKBCv9Kt6Ip 40cI+tkunAGGROS8AIgqfJSCfLAPg/VlV4jvC7IMr+3AHePbZvs9QvhvUKryDjMgtfhA LKRmSxvWiG4ObutXrVM1lxFbXiGErBX3uhQy+gxyhBg9mY2LBUU2Iyub9ZgaEUfJKEzh /sDkUWw9kbXJcgSDaR5ZTe9wj/TwSAZSnr5qAScv31VHT6n8bwqno+r1ApNl6lYvCFMl 4Pag== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0fSDATeY6sUUG3I1fUnnX1wCVMSljF+Xqpepj4zwJry72RzrKQ1qlOTrME07g/Ivu0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.14 with SMTP id m14mr34695042iod.235.1490776527296; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8D6D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.214.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m63sm3402823ioa.15.2017.03.29.01.35.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1490776523.6396.407.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:35:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170329072316.GA3298@jama> References: <20170329072316.GA3298@jama> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.report.20170328_014155.log That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right: == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - openembedded-core == latest upstream commit: 552bd78 wic: use kernel_dir to find systemd-efi bootloader > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf_git.bb:do_compile http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/135202/ "gcc-ar: not found" - that should have been fixed by OE-core 23a12d87a6 "fix toolchain selection", which is included in OE-core 552bd78 and thus should have been included in the build. However, the error above was "Submitted on: 11/03/17 10:13", which was a while ago and in particular before that fix. Did ovmf really fail in the latest world build? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.