From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com (mail-it0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F5577BF3 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e75so86282508itd.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:38:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yFeCwD9Vfbwlu+2Uzlhm7FHxelUi1zFycCklnqXax78=; b=qQcNS76EovLl2ePdu5KypTd/Z+LTmw+tCLOfoq39Fcpl1ckNNPsl0a1eyKV6gkYX15 b4r5yD+B1rM6KVpHIkxFxtrhinCLDrg6y1sDpv7xFpD9gMaZ4d8qkO0wy0anBR9ZwwxR NQLeuSKH9xGSxgtUC4YvJaa/4ZybQL6t4AZvLgTHJGrHpGu/d8Zxih9GdumC7QRDlVOP anfv0ewoLebjmZ1c4jE/fmJ2T5bZSayQGYeRU0wB021uyHxgROHlkLDiYOUzXUifoEdy locmWs+y7p0pt2R34Sqzi/66DDbqCZ+5rQDT4M7oGVVVY3tt05XsMv2DgJyBQQEwGrmF n5ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yFeCwD9Vfbwlu+2Uzlhm7FHxelUi1zFycCklnqXax78=; b=VcYIjmM5p761DPK1wEL+MCsOzBrU9I83jwsq/VaJ+TmE8upksFdq8nP1CdMR635/xM Dx24idUxurtvNbszrbUMubzy1Jb+wxh/JoZ1luT3ZuF0zMk4VPJrqw9x+O8+YgHhs88z S3lNIGUmREUAReMiAvMlhWIGzEFSPj9iDxJzpoTC8pQPqczK0uim95p5qXTLFjiIxIe8 jJdwzwyhmjxMRHxLGtb5k0nxnPsPsigBjEiLePn5tM1LEiTSj1ocqb4HIyz+wTgbqby8 YVzEPAw+vpOamzTZRUTuxFkSp/lAidaZ+WHlICgG162y75V3uFuXEA9wKaJ3jj30lPX5 9a9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2utBeH86urMaI5EiYtSdXs2vJIXOIM9JlJj+gnsAHvXYAcC93Eauo3pd/pJEOYGUmi X-Received: by 10.36.33.68 with SMTP id e65mr258313ita.21.1490780322220; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8D6D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.214.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm3468546iof.29.2017.03.29.02.38.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1490780318.6396.410.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:38:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170329091444.GB3298@jama> References: <20170329072316.GA3298@jama> <1490776523.6396.407.camel@intel.com> <20170329091444.GB3298@jama> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:38:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 11:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.report.20170328_014155.log > > > > That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right: > > > > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - openembedded-core == > > latest upstream commit: > > 552bd78 wic: use kernel_dir to find systemd-efi bootloader > > > > > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf_git.bb:do_compile > > > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/135202/ > > > > "gcc-ar: not found" - that should have been fixed by OE-core 23a12d87a6 > > "fix toolchain selection", which is included in OE-core 552bd78 and thus > > should have been included in the build. > > > > However, the error above was "Submitted on: 11/03/17 10:13", which was a > > while ago and in particular before that fix. > > > > Did ovmf really fail in the latest world build? > > The report shows: > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/34933/ > which leads to: > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/138261/ > Submitted on: 27/03/17 05:31 Got it. I followed the wrong link at some point. > So yes it failed again, but this time with different error: > TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/ovmf/git-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/i586-oe-linux/../../libexec/i586-oe-linux/gcc/i586-oe-linux/6.3.0/ld: > internal error in do_layout, at ../../gold/object.cc:1821 Hmm, internal error in gold. Not sure what to do about that :-/ Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.