From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com (mail-it0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E233077BF3 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id y18so52782638itc.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FQcEKYE0zjmcjDUuJT4ykaL+RzXXvd6lXNCk3xfFBMk=; b=JMtGZh8PEXo4v7FL//gG/KHI6w1zrh9Bg0WrInHQkkh0w2KdcMMmsr5C3HQI3fwGpw ipnbWlMoIC2Xy3pnG3YoXGSTxaM9cZ/1MvM/0A3yXv5qnWwI45t98xdpjEEAFx6g8Q38 9F0CnWKUZ/GcJRJ57yokGq1rV6jqL5y6okzPKPwN4BEd1GK8S/ps9K7q+DfPTxu3WvnM Gqcpilm4tNekIk/vWj23pPBtzdaiMdNbqaRMFZDX/ozC4vvm58dmSn5O+UT2dFrgc/Od jbUGEyx60bRb+/bmoz8os7C+Vs9u38h7f6ygVIS+yAkPUJCDB2WrxbCbBSn8Un+g+cpz RJ2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FQcEKYE0zjmcjDUuJT4ykaL+RzXXvd6lXNCk3xfFBMk=; b=JrFfrRNocPrMb+0bGg1+42lDNeJQjeM9bFSL2EeR6Lia7h625hLfqJuQ7/hbPBpMk6 9BoXTu8GyaZjMBdUK5j3iT7ZEhPWD2YBgtDF3g7gOZkYaM7UMNdIo43QrKBMQnGNfYqg AGLudU1QtMCliHw9FzVufkGZYFKUDjxbq+x2+65XgwtpUxS92pFnwS9JumAiX2jF3rEu MuudILcyjYCJoDms3IJf8TqDn1LOsOl4PowOP3fJ738Z83+gsVJRVy7OKiHKOCLFyGrK qvZB5zQgPVfJsuxqAKo1rjbyPq4Y4YjAwVXrrbuqGfdHKKnpmZ6e5G/72egLQbhbribX rP9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0MKCsQ6PtCwEk99CYYSEBzk1lSSrPobCRCQbGTSBXaAESP36CVv3dicW5p6tAy32bY X-Received: by 10.107.162.76 with SMTP id l73mr181860ioe.1.1490786352818; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8D6D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.214.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o72sm3168449ite.10.2017.03.29.04.19.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1490786348.6396.415.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:19:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20170329072316.GA3298@jama> <1490776523.6396.407.camel@intel.com> <20170329091444.GB3298@jama> <1490780318.6396.410.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:19:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 12:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? > > > > yes, see example in: > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc > > meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind_git.bb Thanks. I'll try to do something similar. > but it was working with older binutils, so maybe worth tracking down > where it got borken. Before my OE-core fix, it was always using /usr/bin/gcc and thus ld. Now that it actually uses the compiler intended for the target, it ends up using gold, which fails. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.