From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Spi9v-0000tE-DQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:51:59 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2012 08:40:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="176975519" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.15]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2012 08:40:43 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:40:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1545322.vi2fespzus@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-26-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3797A80A-708E-422C-B501-ADDB47AD4541@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1342193205-25293-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <4461686.rdlsglFAG9@helios> <3797A80A-708E-422C-B501-ADDB47AD4541@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-oe][meta-efl][PATCH] various: update ; proto= to ; protocol= in SRC_URI X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:51:59 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 13 July 2012 17:37:47 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 13 jul. 2012, om 17:35 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > > On Friday 13 July 2012 17:26:45 Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > > > > Just checking, you're aware that for the svn fetcher this will break with > > older versions of bitbake that don't have the recent patch applied? > > > > If that's not a concern, no problem. > > Not a concern for meta-oe master, only for release branches :) My thinking was that at least in the OE-Classic days we didn't expect the user to have bleeding edge bitbake even in master. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre