From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:47:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1908796.glHMrEiIxU@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F20130D.2010208@balister.org>
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 09:34:53 Philip Balister wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 07:48 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > I think what most people want when they enable meta-oe in their layer
> > configuration is #1, and it's probably OK to get #2 along with it. They do
> > not however expect versions of toolchains, eglibc or other fairly
> > fundamental bits and pieces that might cause their build to fail when
> > everything worked fine just building with OE-Core (#4). Equally I expect
> > there will be some people who want just #3 and nothing else.
>
> My understanding is the OE-Core toolchains lack the Linaro patches which
> a extremely useful for people using armv7. So dropping toolchains from
> meta-oe would be a really bad thing for a large portion of the user base.
I was suggesting moving these toolchains to a separate layer where those who
don't need them aren't tripping over them. Adding such a layer to your
configuration is more or less trivial, and once done you would not notice any
difference.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-25 12:48 Splitting meta-oe Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 14:01 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-25 14:10 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-25 15:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 17:01 ` Enrico
2012-01-25 14:34 ` Philip Balister
2012-01-25 14:47 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-01-25 16:00 ` Philip Balister
2012-01-25 17:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-25 17:51 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-26 9:02 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-26 14:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-26 16:11 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-26 18:36 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-01-26 20:04 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-25 17:41 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 17:57 ` Phil Blundell
[not found] ` <4F2069CC.7060409@balister.org>
2012-01-25 21:03 ` Phil Blundell
2012-01-25 22:12 ` Philip Balister
2012-01-25 17:49 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-25 18:39 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 23:28 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-01 10:07 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-01 10:33 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-01 11:11 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-02-01 15:39 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-05 14:58 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1908796.glHMrEiIxU@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philip@balister.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox