From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com (mail-pg0-f68.google.com [74.125.83.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D295600EA for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 194so13147465pgd.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:57:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bKxXkD10BmtLDXOk/d8yFF8sTCbez1JYmFgefjQTCGo=; b=uYUWSeLP8VNlc/O7CRNYtleVMKSg0MtqrnNH5Aw2Gj8wwOjn5hLpNXUoMRa2RwOX3L EpEgy+U/EQR2CPymLgO/Am20660+QEbmyWm8RJfyURdQ3Uc0WH//CuSM7qsLydch+hIB EYHpu1zmRrvbyXqXHj7BCnOyjJK4WbbTPdhztwl3hWQjWRpvpRLmchWq20rjyFGjWlK3 M5zpWBpQ2sQCUt6YGQoaLoLlRN1w28S6KBlMvtntO5ohwGE+PQFJJXXyjI8LzSM04oMr isjGYBqE6ojNfCqoJuYNHjEQ6LI0bB5QijxSkZLbjCrK7wkjfNSwsWay/jVazjtkoVyP 6vqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bKxXkD10BmtLDXOk/d8yFF8sTCbez1JYmFgefjQTCGo=; b=M8d7VkEdk6oidWDLPq9c9+t0nYRrI2SX5Mb+aoeVEmUCnFX62H2fZ6ut6dsyBQ6Y/t 5sZRNOmpKdz57oa2InYq89Nk7K0VFNadCMFlzJHDaN3WX4M/qJwd/+y11ohzm4GQA3ts qBjAckVqRf3jkb8lzNuvnkaaMetj2ahSZPPESufe2lVpddSoamS+J0x3aIkwzCRx8j8W 0QKrZ4T/Ftsl9f3B0fXzAOka0pjQbo/JSEqUNfIgyZiKimOU8a7ADDaDY35sklnLocBK rNhm8B0c8IyE4eRJyTSg1odKTOuXV78Wr1d6427Hv7AuPXLtST5KClAo4YaOxnvI83ff 4aEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJaCdVG1+8zK4Ne9IBKE97TqqRKKlkSjr+6LQsuqrexTt6xhUcLhYj8ZMdtcS7ihQ== X-Received: by 10.99.177.6 with SMTP id r6mr22765132pgf.61.1486504622936; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:57:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.43.100.166] (50-233-148-156-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.233.148.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j28sm14032811pfj.2.2017.02.07.13.57.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:57:02 -0800 (PST) To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1486399174-28949-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <1486453274.14889.135.camel@intel.com> <20170207102518.GA3276@jama> <1486465148.14889.140.camel@intel.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <198657c0-9cc4-ebad-7ce3-fece22b73c18@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:57:01 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1486465148.14889.140.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: Patchwork-Status via email X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:57:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/07/2017 02:59 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:41:14AM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: >>> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:10 -0800, akuster808 wrote: >>>> please drop. this is fixed via a change in master-next. >>>> >>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?h=master-next&id=2e83e33c592543045a7761907d8cd62937e1e60d >>> Let's see whether the magic keyword works :-) >>> >>> [Patchwork-Status: Superseded] >>> >>> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/136794/ >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly >>> >>> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although >>> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way >>> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak >>> on behalf of Intel on this matter. >> If it was supposed to update status on Patchwork, then it didn't work >> it's still in "New" state. > Jose, in your "parsemail: Set patch state from email metadata" patch you > said that it "allows project maintainers to change a patch status > directly from an email message". > > Can you clarify who the "project maintainers" are who can use this email > interface? The list of maintainers (if its the same list) can be found on https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/ BTW, is there any doc on the keywords? - armin > What about this use case here: the original author wants to retract a > patch. Can he do that via email and/or the web interface? > > I wasn't the original author and probably also no project maintainer, so > I guess that's why my email had no effect. Can we enable some kind of > error response for such cases? >