Re: [RFC] push those patches, push'em up

[Holger Freyther <zecke@selfish.org>]

On Wednesday 13 February 2008 01:41:02 Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OE has quite many patches that are just too valuable to keep to
> ourselves.  In the spirit of our bug sprint weekends, I want to propose
> patch-pushing weekends.  Maybe we can even replace the former with the
> latter.  I'd like to propose the coming weekend as the first of this kind.
>
> To get everybody on the same page and to make sure this is a sustainable
>  effort, I'd also like to propose some soft policy for patches committed
> to OE.  This should help us quickly find those patches still in need of
> some pushing.
>
>  1) first line in a patch starts with upstream: and goes on to list the
>     URL where the bug has been reported upstream.
>  2) further information can optionally be listed in the following fields
>     * status: pending, accepted in XXX, rejected
>     * origin: where the patch has been stolen ;-)
>     * comment: any further detail such as description or reason for
>                application of the patch
>
> Comments?  Volunteers to join the cause?

Hi,
I think we should make the patch header mandantory for new patches and it 
should state:
	-The issue it is fixing and why it is fixing it (comment:)
	-The status: as above, or 'HACK' to mark a patch as such
	-The origin where we got this patch from and then write in the comment if you 
	  change the patch.
	-And if the bug has been filed add the bug URL to the patch as this makes 
	  tracking easy.

I will start doing so.

z.